England vs India: 3 Reasons why Jasprit Bumrah shouldn't have been rested in 2nd Test

During the first Test match at Headingley, India's most impressive bowler was Jasprit Bumrah, who claimed five wickets in the opening innings. He appeared fit and bright in spite of his previous back problems.

Advertisment

Although it's crucial to manage his fatigue, considering India's position in the series, it has drawn criticism to rest him for the second Test, particularly after eight days of recuperation.

Here are the 3 Reasons why Jasprit Bumrah shouldn't have been rested in 2nd Test:

1. India is 0-1 down in the series

Advertisment

After losing the first Test by a significant margin, India was under pressure going into the second Test. Bumrah went wicketless as India failed to defend their 371-run goal in Leeds. Playing your best lineup becomes essential to a successful comeback in such a situation. In a contest that must be won, resting Bumrah seems like a dangerous bet.

In a lengthy Test series, momentum is crucial, and India's defeat in the opening game has already handed England the advantage. When the team is in dire need of a turnaround, it doesn't help to sit out your best bowler. India would have a mountain to climb if it followed a 0–2 trail.

2. Jasprit Bumrah had 8 days of rest

Advertisment

Eight days separated the first Test in Leeds from the second at Edgbaston, which was plenty of time for a carefully thought-out recuperation. Bumrah had exercised thoroughly before the match and had not displayed any signs of weariness or discomfort. It seems overkill to rest him despite the extended break.

While workload management has its place, context is crucial. After losing in Leeds, India needed firepower, not rotation. Giving Bumrah a vacation now could throw off his rhythm precisely when India needed him the most.

3. Jasprit Bumrah is the lone wicket-taking pacer for India

Jasprit Bumrah was the only Indian pacer to regularly cause problems for the English batters in the first Test. The troubles of Siraj, Prasidh, and Shardul, who were unable to provide support, contrasted sharply with his five wickets. In early English conditions, pace became crucial because spin was useless.

When other strike pacers are not working, it can be disastrous to remove your lone strike pacer. India's greatest weapon was Bumrah's ability to destroy partnerships and bowl hostile spells. The bowling attack appears much less dangerous without him.

Stay updated with the latest cricket news, match insights, and exclusive updates at Sky247 India and download the Sky247 app to start betting today!